Aaron Stanford, Kathleen Quinlan, Vinessa Shaw

"The Hills Have Eyes" is the story of a family road trip that goes terrifyingly awry when the travelers become stranded in a government atomic testing zone. Miles from nowhere, the Carters soon realiz...( read more  read more... )e the seemingly uninhabited wasteland is actually the breeding ground of a blood-thirsty mutant family. And, they are the prey.

Flixster Users

64% liked it

369,067 ratings

Critics

49% liked it

134 critics

R, 1 hr. 45 min.

Directed by: Alexandre Aja

Release Date: March 10, 2006

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: March 4, 2008

Stats: 26,295 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (26,295)


  • August 9, 2009
    One of the better horror remakes of recent years, for several reasons: the title sequence is wonderfully disturbing, some of the scenes are really exciting and scary, the acting performances are convincing and their characters not entirely as stupid as in other films of the genre...( read more) and actually fight back. Also: although the political dimensions of a horror film and the criticism on atom testing should not be taken too seriously, it is pretty funny that the Republican gun loving dad does not have quite the same success as his democrat son in law. The violence is pretty graphic and some scenes rather sickening, but at least the film is not as easy to figure out as many others. Hero of the day: the second German shepherd.
  • January 6, 2009
    A family driving through the desert in their mobile home are hijacked by a group of mutants living amongst the ruins of a nuclear test site. I hated the original version of this movie with a passion. It seemed to me to be a load of gratuitous ugliness aimed at voyeuristic sadists...( read more). I was willing to give this a go however because I was quite impressed with the remake of Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and generally try to keep an open mind (except where it comes to musicals of course.) On the plus side, it actually bothered to make the victims 3 dimensional characters, and they were in fact quite a likable, mildly dysfunctional bunch; pretty much like an ordinary family. It also avoids visual gimmickry, and the dreaded shaky cam, which I was thankful for. And it kept my attention til the end. On the other hand, it ticks a lot of the "crap horror movie" boxes; namely it contains the lines "Why are you doing this to us?" and "I'm so scared". It has a crap, barely sketched out back story to excuse the carnage. It has mysterious shapes running around in the foreground/background. It shows far more ugly violence than it needs in order to facilitate the story. And the soundtrack is one of the worst I've EVER heard (it actually has a rousing, cheerleading crescendo while someone is having their head bashed in and being blown apart by a shotgun as if you're suppose to applaud the fact.) I'm going to have to sit on the fence about this one because I know there is a market for it and it does have some cinematic merit in that it's directed and acted reasonably well (which is more than I can say for the original.) However I am certainly not part of it as I find it very hard to enjoy watching people being brutalized and sexually abused, and don't really feel like cheering when someone has an axe buried repeatedly in their spine; no matter how much they "deserved" it.
  • July 18, 2008
    If all the savagery and explicit carnage had a good story to support it, I'd probably have a little respect for this inane, purposeless trash.
  • June 16, 2008
    And I quote...
    It always begins with the Wrong Gas Station...in real life, most gas stations are clean...ish, well-lighted places, where you can buy not only gasoline but groceries, clothes and electronic devices. In horror movies, however, the only gas station in the world is l...( read more)ocated on a desolate road in the middle of 'nowheresville' and it's staffed by a degenerate who shuffles out in his classic coveralls and looks like he hasn't showered since the summer of 69'...
    The clean-cut heroes of the movie, be they a family on vacation, newlyweds, college students or backpackers, all have one thing in common. They believe everything this man tells them, especially when he suggests they turn left on the unpaved road for a shortcut. Does it ever occur to them that in this desolate wasteland with only one main road, it must be the road to stay on if they ever again want to use their cell phones!?...
    No. It does not. ;/ They take the fatal detour, and find themselves the prey of demented mutant incestuous cannibalistic gnashing slobberers, who carry pickaxes the way other people carry umbrellas. They occupy junkyards, towns made entirely of wax, nuclear waste zones and Motel Hell...
    But that's what it's always about isn't it... ;] if they bothered to think for a minute what would we watch the movie for...? the term cult classic comes to mind, but in this case it's not quite a good one...
  • April 7, 2008
    Shocking. Disturbing. At times hard to watch. But these terms also accurately describe this brutally vicious upgrade on Wes Craven's 1977 low-budget horror classic. The movie begins with the showing of original footage from some of the 311 nuclear tests that were carried out by t...( read more)he U.S. government in the desert of New Mexico during the years 1945-1992. The government had ordered the local residents to move so they wouldn't get hurt by the atomic tests. But some of the residents (miners) refused to leave their homes, and were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation. The miners went to the mines and survived, but their newborn children were genetically altered. The children are now adults, and to survive in the desert, they murder and rob tourists going through the desert. They are not only insane murderers, but they have become blood-thirsty cannibals. The Carter family has an accident in the desert, and they are about to become the next victims. However, Big Bob Carter, (Ted Levine), a retired police detective, isn't going to let that happen. This is a shockingly faithful remake in some ways and an entirely new story in others. Fans of the original film will be happy to see that the storyline does not deviate very far from Wes Craven's original tale, but fans of Aja will be quite pleased with the gratuitous gore on display as pick-axes, baseball bats and even po'd German shepherds are used as weapons. The film is very bloody and tense with a grim, filthy atmosphere; you can almost smell the rotting body parts. Everyone turns in great performances despite some moments of clunky dialog. The desolate scenery is a character all its own; hellishly hot and red, littered with vultures and crows. The mutant and gore effects by Howard Berger and Gregory Nicotero are excellent and the photography of the desert landscape is great. A must-see for fans of intense survival horror.
  • November 21, 2009
    Good though there are too many such movies in this genre!
  • November 19, 2009
    It was good. Some parts made me look away (because of the gore) but other than that it was a good action/horror/suspense movie.
  • November 18, 2009
    It's actually just an improved version of the original, which I was pleased to see. The acting talent was extremely better, the effects were great and the music is some of the best horror score i've heard in a while. The freaks are handled so much better, giving them a truly cree...( read more)py edge. It still managed to keep all of the good things about the original, which was all I could've asked for. I especially loved the radioactive plotline, it worked out perfectly (the bombing houses are truly creepy). The "super" Sloth fight scene was a nice touch as well.
  • November 16, 2009
    I'm a man, and I can withstand a lot of crap... but this movie has a rape scene that sends chills. other than that this movie is Deliverance and Wrong Turn on steriods. intense and strange at parts. Leave your brain at the door and prepare to absorb some funky charactors
  • November 15, 2009
    The hills have eyes. WAIT, WHAT? EYES?

Critic Reviews


March 31, 2006
Kurt Loder, MTV

Filmmakers] Aja and Levasseur have no doubt created the cannibal
holocaust of their dreams. It's certainly as brutal, bloody and
ambitiously disgusting as the most demanding fan might wish. full review

March 20, 2006
Nick Schager, Lessons of Darkness

What's fundamentally missing is the anarchic, irrational unpredictability that made the original so terrifying. full review

March 10, 2006
Kyle Smith, New York Post

It's pretty dull to watch people killing each other for an hour and a half, no matter how bloody the pickax work gets. full review

March 10, 2006
Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail

This is not a remake or reinterpretation of Craven's film so much as a recapitulation of ideas from that film and other movies. full review

March 9, 2006
Claudia Puig, USA Today

There is a strange lack of tension and no real jolts of fear in this remake of the 1977 Wes Craven film. full review

March 9, 2006
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

It is not faulty logic that derails The Hills have Eyes, however, but faulty drama. The movie is a one-trick pony. full review

March 9, 2006
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

Using considerable creative intelligence and millions of dollars with no purpose other than profit by inspiring bloodlust is monstrous. full review

March 8, 2006
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Aja also comes out squarely against nuclear testing. How brave. What good is a wallow in sicko sadism if you take all the fun out of it? full review

View more The Hills Have Eyes reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • SemeCutey
    March 29, 2008
    this is my favourite scary movie
  • rachloveherbro
    December 11, 2007
    Oh my god i loved this movie very worth while seeing i watched it 4 times in a row im 12 and am a horror movie freak i loved it except it wasn't that scary. the second one tho is not the best the 1st is better.
  • neatsvuaddict
    September 4, 2007
    Great movie, very disturbing, but great!!!
  • sarahzombie
    August 31, 2007
    Go watch Finding Nemo bitch.
  • megr301
    July 11, 2007
    the worse and sickest movie ever made the guy who thought of this shit should be put away in a small box and never let out
  • bettycursefan
    June 17, 2007
    I freaking loved this movie.
  • rlague
    June 13, 2007
    this movie is funny....creepy at first but funny
  • lovecyn4ever
    May 4, 2007
    Great remake & a very brutal horror flick that's way better than the original.

    Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
  • princessamanda2
    April 10, 2007
    this movie is really good. my dad got it and me him and my step mom was watching it and he got a phone call so he went outside to talk and left me and my step mom inside. She had nail marks on her arm when it aws over.
  • letsgokill
    April 9, 2007
    LIKED THE MOVIE...BUT U COULD TELL THAT IT WAS FAKE

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Saw III
    Saw III (65%)
  • Hostel
    Hostel (68%)
  • Hostel: Part II
    Hostel: Part II (70%)
  • Motel Hell
    Motel Hell (33%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Hills Have Ey... : Watch Free on TV


The Hills Have Eyes Trivia


  • What Wes Craven classic horror film had a poster in the basement of the creepy old cabin in Sam Raimi's "The Evil Dead"?  Answer »
  • Which movie has this tagline : " The lucky ones die first "  Answer »
  • Which movie had the tagline "The lucky ones die first"?  Answer »
  • I have characters with the following names in me: Big Brain, Ruby, Roach, and Big Bob...  Answer »

Most Popular Skin